Nintendo has been actively taking down YouTube videos that feature its games being emulated or modded, which has sparked significant discussion and concern within the gaming community.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 days ago

    So you’re saying I should never buy anything from Nintendo?

    Cool cool cool, cool, cool.

  • Hudomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    With all these news recently, you could think Nintendo wants to be hated. It’s truly shameful how the company has fallen since Iwata is gone.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      7 days ago

      On the plus side, it makes me feel extra good when I load their games onto my hacked Switch! Echoes of Wisdom was fun, but felt really short. I would have felt cheated if I’d spent $60 on it.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I mean, its predecessor was a basic-ass remake of a ten hour, thirty year old Game Boy game that also cost $60.

        • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I love that game, but I fucking hate the remake’s artstyle. Its completely put me off from trying Echoes even though the premise and gameplay of that one seem right up my alley.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t mind the art style, other than the ugly-ass blur filter applied to the bottom of the screen. Fortunately, you can remove it if you’re playing it emulated or on a hacked Switch.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nintendo has gone after youtubers and content creators for 15+ years. They are infamous for it.

    • sus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 days ago

      to be honest, 80% of their customers probably don’t even know what an emulator is and don’t follow news about nintendo

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      They still did this stuff under Iwata. It’s actually more of a Japanese thing than a Nintendo thing. Although the quality of stuff was better under Iwata

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      All they have is their IP, they must protect it at all costs. Nintendo doesn’t even let Shingeru Myamoto wipe is own ass out of fear he will get hurt.

  • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 days ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if this backfires a bit. The reason most publishers/IP holders don’t go after videos on youtube and twitch is because it’s basically free advertisement for your game.

    If this behavior leads to people holding back on making nintendo based content, it could fuck them over in the long run. If you were a streamer or youtuber, would you feel particularly comfortable making videos and streaming nintendo games?

    I know I wouldn’t. There is no guarantee that nintendo actually puts effort into determining whether you are using an emulator or not. And even for the people who do use emulators, they may not be looking to continue making nintendo content.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nintendo is going after a lot of their biggest fans. It’s so obviously stupid, but they just keep doing it.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’ve been doing this for a long time, and it definitely has a depressive effect. Even a big gaming youtubers like Videogamedunkey has commented on how every single time he does a video about a Nintendo game it gets demonetized, and while he can afford to take the financial hit every now and then there are plenty of mid-tier creators who can’t.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sounds like someone got promoted to a high position. If I’m right it’s the typical “New Manager Must Make Waves To Prove They Belong” level of stupid unique to corporate.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    7 days ago

    They just killed Ryujinx too, proving it wasn’t the fact that Yuzu was making money.

  • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I grew up with a Nintendo controller in hand.

    There’s a very good reason I now game almost exclusively on PC. None of this is going to convince me to come back. Quite the opposite in fact.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nintendo has been on my list of most hated companies for awhile now. Just can’t stand how they operate and design their games.

    • schema@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Grew up the same way. Some of my all time favorite games are still some of the classics. That being said, I wouldnt shed a tear if they go bankrupt.

  • Arkatakor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I like their panoply of games, but I cannot in good conscience support this company. The time, effort and money they spent on their legal department could have been used elsewhere… Like pokemon maybe? I’m glad Palword saw daylight.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        7 days ago

        Is that surprising to anyone? The specific grounds they’ve chosen for that lawsuit is odd but if any of their legal battles have merit its that one. Palworld is intentionally toeing the line between derivative and blatant ripoff.

        • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          7 days ago

          I mean, gaming patents are horse shit from stage one. There’s 0 reason you should be able to patent a method or mechanic in a creative medium other than creepy corporate BS

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            That was the selling point behind this game “The Medium”. The copy was the most tone-deaf thing, gloating about its one-of-a-kind patented mechanic.

            My first reaction, especially as an aspiring indie dev: “Well, I’m not touching that just on principle.”

            Jerks.

            • Final Remix@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              That was the one where the chick could switch to white hair and swap between “worlds” just like Silent Hill but slightly different?

              • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                Yeah, except I think you could play two characters in parallel (universes?) at the same time.

                Seemed neat. Shame they had to encumber it like that.

                It also basically screams “If not for this super amazing novel mechanic…this is nothing special!”

          • jeeva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Honestly, though - “method or mechanic”, do you think palworld is a pretty blatant copy of Pokémon or not? Like, most of it. Not just a single bit.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            That logic could easily apply to any kind of patent or copyright. That’s not to say you’re wrong but it’s part of a larger discussion than it seemed like was happening here.

  • GeneralInterest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    If someone has bought a Switch game legally, then it’s legal to dump that game to a PC and play it on a Switch emulator, right?

    Sure you could say that very few people dump their own games, but those that do are doing everything legally I think?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      it’s legal to dump that game to a PC and play it on a Switch emulator, right?

      Depends on where you live. Copyright law varies significantly from country to country.

      In the USA, section 117 of the copyright act lets you create a copy for archival/backup purposes only. What I’m unsure about (and don’t know if there’s any relevant caselaw) is whether bypassing copy protection to create the copy violates the DMCA.

      The equivalent Australian copyright law explicitly states that you can use the backup copy instead of the original one. The US law doesn’t (all it says is that you can make an archival copy, not how you can use the archival copy), so it’s a grey area.

      Both laws are for “computer software”, but you could easily argue that a video game is computer software.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t see any way you could argue a video game isn’t computer software. It literally just is.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nintendo could try make up something like “it’s not computer software since the Switch is a console, not a computer” or something like that. Not a great argument, but they have good lawyers and could probably convince a court that it’s true.

          • phx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            But the game is running on a computer with the emulator which still strongly lends to it being software

            • helpmyusernamewontfi@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I think I somewhat recall during the peak Wii U disaster era, during shareholder meetings Nintendo would call the games for the system “Software”. So, that’d definitely backfire on them I’m sure