• Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    15 days ago

    One person was arguing that they shouldn’t be able to refuse to do “chores” in prison, but the things they do there are things like making license plates, furniture, and fighting wildfires. A bit far from mopping up and taking out the garbage.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Is that person wrong though? Would they be able to refuse “chores”?

      Edit: This is not a rhetorical question. I want to know if they are factually correct or not.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        They’re in prison. Forcing them to do anything is wrong. We’ve already taken their freedom. Using them as labor is morally wrong. Especially when you look at the punishments like solitary.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          I’d argue that simple chores can be used to help inmates get used to structured work as part of a reintegration effort. Of course that only makes sense if reintegration is the main goal of the prison system, which isn’t the case in the United States.

          In any way, if inmates were to do labor, they’d have to be subject to labor law including worker protections and minimum wage provisions. That would probably require the United States to abolish slavery first, which isn’t going to happen anytime soon.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            Man…. The disconnect here

            Prisons are almost entirely run by prisoners. There are no “labor laws”

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              14 days ago

              Prisons are almost entirely run by prisoners. There are no “labor laws”

              That’s what they’re saying.

              If prisoners are to do manual labor, labor laws should apply, but that would require the USA to abolish slavery.

              • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 days ago

                Nonsense. Of course abolishing prison slavery would be a good thing. But the alternative, should such involuntary servitude remain, would be to impose humane regulations on such labor.

          • Cheems@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 days ago

            If it’s not against their will. Sure.

            A guy I knew once that I definitely wouldn’t call a friend, used to say, “the only way you can change a man is if he’s in diapers.”

            And in a lot of different aspects that has resonated with me, in this case, if you’re forcing a person to do labor in order to make that a better functioning member of society… It’s not going to work. They may just do the work they are forced to do without changing at all. Or they just cause trouble. OR, you hire prisoners to do the job that they need and then substitute labor that they can’t hire within. But the logic or forcing someone into submission just will never work, that’s definitely a reason why the recidivation is high.

          • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 days ago

            A lot of these folks in prison were raised “free range” or completely feral and thus were never taught even the most basic elements of home care and cleaning. Knowing how and when to do those “chores” is essential should any of them want to reintegrate into society as any sort of a functioning person. Like the military will show recruits basic hygiene because some of these recruits were never taught it.

            • sozesoze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Oh wow, we are doing these savages a service! Now, go put out that wildfire, unclean one /s

              Jesus, this sounds like Europeans landing at whatever they colonized centuries ago

                  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    Mowing the lawn, washing the dishes and cleaning the bathroom were chores. Which is what I’m referring to as chores. Firefighting was not a chore where I grew up. I guess it must be different where you did.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          That was not a rhetorical question. I am asking if that argument is or is not factually correct.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            They can’t refuse any job short of firefighting. They will be punished for doing so. Reports from former inmates indicate punishments range from solitary to beatings.

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Let me rephrase: would the proposition, if it had passed, prohibited prisons from requiring prisoners to perform domestic duties within the prison?

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                See that’s still too vague. Cleaning the bathroom is a domestic duty and yet is something a janitor does in this context. I would say that’s probably the dividing line, if it’s something you’d pay someone to do then they would be banned from requiring it.

                • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  I guess I’ll put my personal opinion on the record here. I think that penal labour is generally an exploitative industry, if you want to call it that. And I do think that prisoners who perform work should be paid for that work. At the same time, I’m also sensitive to the fact that it costs a great deal of money to pay for room and board and security for prisoners, and that it’s also fair that their labour be used to offset some of the cost of their own imprisonment rather than laying the burden entirely on the public purse.

                  So while I don’t support solitary confinement as a punishment (for anything), I do think that prisoners should have to at a minimum cook and clean for themselves. If they don’t want to cook, then nobody else should have to do it; they just won’t have dinner that night if they don’t cook and serve it themselves. If nobody wants to wash the dishes, then it’s not the administration’s problem if there aren’t any clean plates to use for the next meal. If nobody wants to clean the shower, then it’s not the administration’s problem if grime starts to build up on it. The State should not force the prisoners to work, but it also shouldn’t be the State’s responsibility to provide janitors or cooks to look after them.

                  Which means I agree that “extra” work beyond what’s necessary to maintain the basic needs of the prisoners should be paid and optional. “Optional” meaning there’s no punishment if you choose not to do it, but if you don’t, you won’t have money to pay for services like postage stamps, extra phone calls, or the prison commissary. Even if prisoners are only paid half of minimum wage, that’s still an improvement, because it recognises that their labour has value and this money can also be used to pay for fines and restitution. A pretty common problem among the newly-released is that they are saddled with an obscene amount of debt because the State makes them pay court costs, room and board, fines, parole monitoring fees, and restitution but only pays them fifty cents an hour for their work, meaning they leave prison thousands of dollars in debt with the threat of parole revocation if they can’t pay. That just drives people to resort to crime in order to find the money.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    Congratulations you just created a prisoner government that will require select prisoners to do all the work or be physically and sexually assaulted.

                    We put them there, it’s our responsibility to take care of them. There’s no getting around that.

                  • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    If nobody wants to clean the shower, then it’s not the administration’s problem if grime starts to build up on it.

                    Some of these examples amount to de facto collective punishment by introducing a tragedy of the commons.

                    “The new arrival didn’t clean up the ancient infested shower of disease, so she too consents to never getting a shower.”

                    Paying some prisoner a pittance to clean the shower every week would be insignificant compared to the cost of containing them. And it reduces the incentive for a gang to privatize the showers.

                    Let’s not experiment on clever new prison ideas. Let’s just copy Finland.

                  • daltotron@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    The State should not force the prisoners to work, but it also shouldn’t be the State’s responsibility to provide janitors or cooks to look after them.

                    You should understand that this represents a logistical problem for the prison. Now they have to ensure that prisoners are certified and trained to handle food, no small feat, and you also have to be conscious of the idea that prisoners could pretty easily stop doing dishes, making food, eating food, as a form of hunger strike, in order to protest the very fact that they’re being made to make food, on top of the fact that they’re being extricated from society, deprived of the right to be a productive member of society, deprived of the ability to socialize with other people that aren’t criminals, deprived of free access to information, really, any freedom whatsoever.

                    That’s along with the argument the other commenter brought up, about prisoners just organizing themselves into a de-facto government where the most shat on prisoners will have to do everything. If you decide to come up with a constant rotation, a chore wheel, then at a certain level this just devolves into massive levels of prison corruption, where a couple bribes to a couple prisoner guards can change around some labor forms and then suddenly, again, the most shat upon prisoners are doing all the labor.

                    You don’t eliminate these inefficiencies at any point, either, these inefficiencies rear their heads more the more people you arrest and put into the prison, the more things you criminalize, the higher the recidivism rates. None of these issues resolve magically, they get worse.

                    This is effectively just the same as advocating for the status quo as it currently exists, with the only minor difference between, say, making license plates or fighting fires, being that instead, they’re just doing domestic labor which is much closer to them in proximity, and easier for you to think of as their personal responsibility to handle. That doesn’t matter so much, what matters in reality here are the numbers.

                    The idea is that you’re trying to recoup the costs immediately through something like a labor camp, which is what this still is. That’s sort of an option of last resort, or an option that is used, in most circumstances, as it is right now, for members of political opposition or other kinds of outright status-quo threats. You instead should make the calculation in the broad strokes, years down the line. Can these murderers, thieves, and perhaps even, gasp, loiterers, be taught to be functioning members of society? Can they give back more than they have taken from the taxpayer over the course of their life? More than just for the individuals, but can these prisoners do this on the whole?

                    That’s the way you should be thinking about this, not “Can we save 15 bucks here and there by not paying someone to clean up or cook for the prisoners?”. By framing it like that, you’ve bought into the argument that supports the status quo organization, here.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Prisoners are a subset of the working class. I am advocating for giving them jobs and paying them a reasonable hourly wage for those jobs (measured in dollars and not cents) so that they can gain work experience that is useful when they are released, and so that the fruits of their labour can also be used to offset the cost of their incarceration, compensate the victims of their crime, and build up a nest egg that can be used to help them re-integrate back into society.

          And these jobs are not typically those that the free working class are willing to do anyway. That’s why the companies offering these kinds of jobs always get busted hiring undocumented workers paying them next to nothing with no paid breaks, days off, overtime pay, and in horrendous working conditions.