bartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 7 months agoAll lives rulesuppo.fiimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down11
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAll lives rulesuppo.fibartolomeo@suppo.fi to Memes@lemmy.ml · 7 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoLiterally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”. “Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
minus-squareWallEx@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoMaybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoBoth are consistent within the confines of the definition.
Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.
“Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.
Maybe for you that’s the case, I definitely have a definition of morally good and both sides aren’t that. Accepting collateral for example. You can’t be good in my book if you’re doing that, and they both did.
Removed by mod
Both are consistent within the confines of the definition.