• zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 年前

    But is it also the average household salary? Most boomers were single income. Then in the late eighties early nineties people realized that you could get higher mortgages in a double income, and as a result houses got a lot more expensive. Also, interest rates have declined a lot since the eighties, which also allowed people to borrow more.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 年前

      That just adds to my point? It doesn’t matter why it happened, housing is significantly more expensive compared to income. But since you brought it up, let’s do the math.

      $15,000 average salary, single income, $37,000 house. That’s about 30 months salary.

      $55,000 average salary, dual income ($110,000), $420,000 house. That’s 45 months salary. With both people working.

      So…yeah, seems like “the basics” are a lot harder to achieve nowadays than they were in the 80s.

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 年前

        I really wouldn’t know if that last statement is true. We were only discussing housing, so not all of the basics. Also, like I said earlier, interest rates on mortgages were higher in the past. I would also consider this when comparing, because the interest can be more than total debt.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 年前

          Interest rates peaked in '81 at 18% and yes that brings it closer to today’s % of income…but it plummeted within a few years.

          And housing/mortgage stuff isn’t the only part in this equation - the bottom 90% of the country has been getting significantly less for their labor since Reagan. Money is hoarded and wages have not kept up with inflation