But of course we all know that the big manufacturers don’t do this not because they can’t but because they don’t want to. Planned obsolescence is still very much the name of the game, despite all the bullshit they spout about sustainability.

  • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This article seems to omit the most important fact about headphones - how do they sound?

    I love repairability and all, but it hardly matters if I don’t want to use them in the first place because they traded off too much quality for repairability.

    • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I get what you’re saying, kind of…

      But also, most modern earbuds usually sound quite good. Quality in general has become such a bizarre moving target, but here’s my take: We’ve become so used to constant improvement at the expense of satisfaction. I can barely notice the difference between 1080p and 4k. In my mind they’re both “good quality” and therefore I’m satisfied. Same goes for audio quality. I’ve used a few pairs of earbuds and they have sounded “good.”

      As a culture, we need to stop with throwing away of perfectly good devices, because it’s extremely harmful to the planet’s occupants.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There are indeed good aspects to this product.

    But I won’t join the “Fairphone good” circle jerk and give them the free publicity, because just like Apple and Samsung, they removed the headphone jack from their phones soon before the launch of these headphones, in other words, artificially creating the problem and need to sell you their expensive solution.

    You don’t get to ride the “we are pro customer!” free publicity train while also wanting to be the next Apple.

    • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I understand people’s desire for a headphone port, but I really don’t understand the hate for devices that don’t have one. It would be one thing if they vendor-locked Bluetooth headphones so you had to use theirs, but it really just seems like a common sense move in a world where Bluetooth reigns supreme.

      As long as a USB-C adapter still provides the same functionality, I really don’t see anyone’s choices being taken away. If it is one less physical port on the device that helps streamline the hardware, I’m all for it too.

      And if it is a dealbreaker, you don’t have to buy a fairphone.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m with you. The hate has always seemed a bit like a first world problem.

      • blssflbreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        it’s partially because we are running out of options that have the headphone jack, and the only reason to remove them is to boost sales of more expensive bluetooth sets. Bluetooth really doesn’t reign supreme yet because wired headphones are still more convenient, cheaper to produce, and last longer than their bluetooth counterparts. the only reason it’s so common is because it keeps getting removed from phones so people don’t have a choice in the matter.

        • ECB@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think they mean “reign supreme” in the sense that, given the choice, most people these days would choose the bluetooth anyways.

          Its just so nice to not have a cord…

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The problem is that there are fewer and fewer options with a headphone jack. My current phone has one and I use it all the time.

        Bluetooth sucks for a variety of reasons, such as:

        • not private
        • needs to charge (I’ve had BT headphones die on road trips or whatever)
        • not great sound quality

        I also like using bluetooth headphones sometimes, but having an option is good, and I don’t want to bring a dongle around everywhere.

        • Vaderhoff@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Honestly most of these points don’t make a whole lot sense, yet these are the arguments I see every time wireless ear buds pop up in any conversation. Phones by nature are not private, and honestly, who is trying to intercept Bluetooth close to you anyways? Majority of what they would likely get is “oh another person listening to music or tiktok”. I haven’t charged my 3 year old $50 Bluetooth buds in weeks, and they are still sitting at great battery health. Proper research and care goes a long way, though the option to have replacement batteries is def a plus. And if you’re going on long road trips, just pack an adapter and wired headphones if you’re that conscious. What are you doing with your phone that you need top-tier audio quality on the go? Just seems like a very very niche market.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Majority of what they would likely get is “oh another person listening to music or tiktok”

            Bluetooth data is encrypted, that’s not what I’m worried about. I’m more concerned about tracking.

            Bluetooth transmits a unique ID, which can be picked up by any curious individual. That’s pretty much how “Find my Droid” and “Find my iPhone” work, and providing even more devices to track isn’t great. I can turn off the Bluetooth in my phone and use wired headphones to avoid it, and removing the jack makes that more annoying.

            top-tier audio quality on the go? Just seems like a very very niche market

            Why not? I often listen to music or whatever when exercising, riding transit, or doing yardwork. Having good sounding headphones is really nice.

            Audio jacks cost almost nothing, and I can buy them for <$1 each from Amazon, less if I buy in bulk. So it’s not a cost savings, and they’re not particularly big, so why do they need to remove it?

            Even if you don’t care about privacy or audio quality, it’s just really convenient to be able to use any cheap earbuds if you lose your nicer pair when on vacation or whatever. Why not have the option? Why force people to use an adapter?

            I also have Bluetooth headphones (bone conduction for listening to audiobooks on my bike), yet I still prefer the wired headphones around the house, on walks, and pretty much everywhere else.

            • Vaderhoff@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think the removal is less so the conspiracy, and more so just spacing on the board or even just pure neglect at this point, but I could be wrong. But I’m good with every other point you threw up there. The tracking bit does make sense too, just no one has ever mentioned it. Though I still don’t think anyone is hunting me personally lol. I understand having peace of mind is also good too, and honestly, should not be a luxury like it feels these days.

        • Damage@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Get an USB c dongle and leave it on the cord then… I too wish we still had jacks, but that battle’s lost, and attacking the only somewhat conscientious phone manufacturer for following trends set by bigger companies is myopic. They do what they must to compete, it’s not like they’re drowning in money.

          • Plopp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even USB-C dongles suck.

            There are two types: ones that passes through the analog audio signal from the phone’s internal DAC, and ones that have a built in DAC and pretty much acts as external USB sound card. You need to know which type your phone supports and which type it is you’re buying.

            If it’s the type that has a built-in DAC (which I think is the most common but I might be wrong) they are fury-inducing absolute monstrous pains in the ass if there’s the slightest glitch in the USB connection. Because it’s like unplugging the audio device. Playback just stops for seemingly no reason and it doesn’t resume once the connection is good again.

            My solution is wired headphones plugged in to a small BT receiver I keep in my pocket. That way I get both an annoying cable and shitty audio quality lol.

            • Damage@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              I don’t see why you’d buy the more expensive one with the DAC. If the quality from the jack was enough before, the quality from the USB must be as well, it’s not like they removed the DAC from the SoC.

        • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Most Bluetooth headphones are encrypted with a key shared only by the headphones and the host device. Not sure why you think they aren’t private. Maybe really cheap or really old headphones might not be so secure, but the vast majority of Bluetooth headphones in use today absolutely are.

          Charging and audio quality are legitimate concerns, but again, you still have a headphone port… It’s just part of the USB-C port on the bottom of your phone. A $5 adapter completely absolves you of having to use Bluetooth.

          I really don’t see how needing an adapter is a big enough deal to care about the way people here seem to.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            They broadcast the ID and I think type of device. Yeah, the data sent between the devices is encrypted, but that’s not really an improvement over wired headphones since the signal is privacy by virtue of not being broadcast everywhere.

            A $5 adapter

            It’s not the price that’s the issue, but the convenience. I can’t change my phone while using the adapter, and I have to bring it along wherever I go. Why should I need an adapter for something that used to come standard?

            What do I gain from not having a headphone jack? A slightly thinner phone due to slightly more space for the battery? My current phone has a headphone jack, and it’s no bigger than any other phone, and it has a larger battery than most. Better water resistance? I’ve never lost a phone due to water.

            So I’ll flip it around, why do you not want a headphone jack? What about a micro-SD card?

            My next phone will probably not have a headphone jack, and I’m annoyed just thinking about it.

            • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I can’t change my phone while using the adapter

              Why should I need an adapter for something that used to come standard?

              The same reason you needed a new charging cable every time the USB standard changes: because technology standards change over time.

              If anything, audio adapters have been a thing for decades longer than cell phones have existed. This is not a new development at all.

              What about a micro-SD card?

              My phone has an completely excessive 512GB of storage, and I can use USB drives (including micro SD adapters) if I really want to save something to external storage.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yep, same excuses as Apple.

        Analogue connector too old, too big, hard to make modular. All proven false by a multitude of other devices.

        • Stull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It might be false, but I think the real reason is that very few people care about a jackstick… I care, but I’m the only one I know, and I only ever hear a small group of people online talk about it being a big deal. In the end I don’t think too badly about that specific decision from any phone manufacturer.

          • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Heck, I don’t even care about having an audio jack as long as there are two USB-C ports. I’m a down for a unified connector. There just needs to be enough ports for it.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cost. The Fairphone is already too expensive for what it offers.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Okay, but my phone has a jack and absolutely dog water sound quality. Because it has a jack it does not support the USB DAC which I use on my desktop.

      Worst part is, the whole USB DAC is $12 including shipping and it has USB connector and 3.5mm, and an amp. They cheaped out on this part not only on the phone, but also on the motherboard. On my computer the amp is way too weak to drive my around ear headphones.

      So if it’s a crap one maybe they shouldn’t even include it, since I’ll have to use a USB DAC to get perfectly transparent sound. The only good one I own is on my budget Acer Aspire laptop.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Meh.

    Overpriced.

    I can buy 3 or 4 pairs of BT5 earphones for the price of these.

    My most expensive pair currently was $75.

    I’ve never had batteries go bad in them - they get broken well before that happens. Though I have a noise canceling headset from 2006 that still works. Battery lasts long enough.

    I’d rather break a pair of $30 earphones, and have multiple spares than a single pair of $150.

    And they all sound about the same given the source and environment.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Overpriced.

      their entire premise is making sure that people on the supply chain of their devices are compensated adequately (hence the “Fair” in the name), which is why their products are more expensive than you’re used to.

      • UckyBon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s called feel-good marketing. Similar to organic veggies or ethical coffee from Starbucks.

        • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t know about Starbucks or Big Organic Veggie, but Fairphone publishes annual reports on sustainability and life quality of their workers.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My batteries are already on their last legs in the Sony tws, but I’ll be replacing them with new ones.

      If your $30 earphones break before their batteries do, maybe consider buying something that does not break in a year of use?

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      fuck wireless headphones! I don’t want to remember charging another god damn thing to start with.

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m right there with ya. I know many people prefer wireless earbuds, but I like ripping cables out of my ears at random. Makes me feel alive.

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Am I the only one that can’t stand the few hundred millisecond delay of Bluetooth audio?

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not at all! It drives me nuts. I’ve tried watching movies with Bluetooth headphones on, so as not to bug my wife at night, and it just feels off. Almost like watching old subtitled movies. I checked it out and my headphones have a ~250ms response time. My car’s system literally has a nearly two second delay and I can’t take it.

        • blssflbreeze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          that isn’t the typical experience though, and letting your batteries drain completely is bad for them. also if you don’t have some sort of routine, a lot of people (myself included) end up forgetting to charge them and end up with no working headphones until they can charge them again, which is pretty annoying.

          • Persen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, I get it. I would still use wired headphones, but I got bluetooth ones as a gift. And to add to your critisism, batteries die and you have to replace them around every 10 years.

            • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I haven’t had wired headphones last me more than a year. One bad snag on a cable any they’re done. 10 years is a long time.

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    What I don’t get is how no company seems to have worked out a legitimately good service and maintenance model for tech products. Fairphone hasn’t invented the wheel here. They’re going to make money on maintenance, parts and repair.

    I would think there would be lowered costs involved in not having to push out a new product every 6 months and market it to customers who just bought something less than a year ago.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The service and maintenance model is largely “replace it”.

      Everyone looks to a desktop computer where you swap out a stick of ram or whatever. But the real key is to look at laptops. Yes, a LOT of vendors solder the god damned ram in place and so forth which is bullshit. But repairs are generally less “okay, let me re-solder this one connection” since that connection is a via that is embedded in a circuitboard. So it becomes “let’s replace that board”. And yes, efforts can be made to split up the board more but you lose latency savings and increase the complexity of the boards because you now need to add connection points and so forth.

      And then you look at earbuds where… do you even have room for connectors like that? Near as I can tell, Fairbuds let you replace a few pieces of plastic, the rubber earplugs, the in-bud battery, and the charger (possibly just the battery?). That is definitely a step in the right direction but it also becomes a question of how much that even matters. In particular, I am wary of the value-add of the internal batteries since charging a lithium battery is largely “solved” and these have an external controller (the case) that can preserve the battery.

      While I think we can do better in some spaces, the reality is that a lot of modern tech is fundamentally un-repairable. Not because of evil conspiracies but just because it is a lot easier to print a PCB and slot in some components than it is to connect vacuum tube diodes. And when so many of those components are fairly complex chips and the damage is less “oh, the metal prong on this chip broke” and more “oh, the via shorted out”?

      Stuff like the fairbuds just seem… real stupid to me. Fairphone level “replace and repair” is kind of borderline but I think is generally good. And while I have series issues with how Framework does it and the resulting e-waste, I love the ethos of their laptops.

      But We need to pick and choose our battles to be ones that make sense. Will Smith’s Tested’s Adam Savage just uploaded a video where he gushed about how easy it was to repair a kitchenaid mixer and that is an AWESOME video. That is the kind of repairs that people can meaningfully make. Using an x-ray machine to detect a possible short in a chip and hoping that was the only short… is not.

      And in those cases? We need strong warranties AND strong e-waste recycling programs and incentives. Electronics are increasingly disposable for good and bad reasons. The junk drawer full of old phones and swelling batteries is bad.

      • BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s the thing about capitalism, it doesn’t have to be a conspiracy to be evil. Capitalism will optimize for the cheapest option to acquire the most profit, and generally the cheapest option is also the one that’s the worst for the workers/environment/consumers.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I am wary of the value-add of the internal batteries since charging a lithium battery is largely “solved” and these have an external controller (the case) that can preserve the battery.

        Li-ion batteries wear out with normal use, or even sitting on a shelf fully charged. I suspect the battery is the primary reason most devices with onboard charging become unusable over time, and ensuring that it is user-replaceable will greatly increase average service life.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The wear and tear is greatly exaggerated (more specifically, it is based on older tech and before we had chargers that cycled correctly) and the technology (bluetooth has made leaps and bounds the past few years) is likely to be outdated long before the battery fails.

          It is one of those things that I want on principle but very much question the value of. And considering that this is a zero sum game where the time and cost of the replaceable battery comes from somewhere else (in the case of cost: the consumer’s pocket because holy crap these are expensive…).

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            My Sony linkbuds S only last two hours now. It’s a product from 2022. When did they solve batteries? Because it wasn’t in 2022

            The product in question is not outdated because they rolled out updates for the new features, like Bluetooth LE audio

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Honestly? it sounds like you bought a stinker then. Because I have some (I forget if they are anker or jabra) earbuds that are MAYBE a few minutes off of what they were when I got them before the pandemic (so 2019/2020).

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                It depends on how many hours a day you use them, not comparable between people

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The business models of the current tech giants are very much based on planned obsolescence. Selling you a gadget for $ 1000 every two years will always be more profitable than selling you one very five years and doing service in the meantime.

      • kirklennon@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Selling you a gadget for $ 1000 every two years will always be more profitable than selling you one very five years and doing service in the meantime.

        Are you aware that the current version of iOS is supported by the phones Apple released in 2018? And they’re still releasing security updates for the prior version, with support for 2017’s iPhone 8?

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          and thats fine until you need replacement for a cracked screen or a bad battery and you find out its almost as expensive as a brand new phone. it good that they are doing it but software is just 50% of the problem.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is before you even get into the ewaste and limited precious metals

          • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even for unrepairable, at fault replacement(you stepped on it) apple will normally sell you a reconditioned perfect replacement for 50% the cost.

            Reliable repair and ultrafast swap and restore are one off the reasons I stick with apple.

            In no case is it ever “ almost the price of a new one”.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              ill repost this for good measure:

              thats the price of another equivalent, or a decent brand new android.