• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      All they have to do is pledge to follow the Leahy Law…

      Israel won’t comply, which means we legally can’t provide arms. Kamala doesn’t even have to be “the bad guy”, she can just say she’s choosing to follow American law and if Israel wants arms then they can comply like every other recipient has to.

      It’s really as easy as saying:

      If elected I will not break American law to send arms to foreign countries.

      Boom, election locked up.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You people really have a massively inflated concept of how many voting progressives that there are. Get off the internet for a while…

        Harris would 100% lose the election if she said that.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        How many voters would she lose if she declared intent to stop assisting Isreal?

        She might possibly gain a few, but would she lose any?

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s a valid question and I’m sure the Harris campaign has spent considerable resources trying to get a good estimate of that number.

          It’s pretty insane that the Democratic party officials have to say, “We’d love to stop funding a genocide but our members won’t vote for us if we do that.”

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is not about voters, it’s about money. Both parties are bribed to keep it going.

        • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          She would likely gain voters because she would be distinguishing herself from Biden who remains deeply unpopular.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          She’d gain more than she’d lose, even before counting in the electoral college. Conditioning Israeli aid is supported by the majority of people of Democrats, Republicans and independents, and the people who don’t want it don’t care too much either way. Definitely not more than left wingers who want the genocide to stop. In terms of votes it’s a no brainer.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yeah, I would hope there are more anti-genocide voters but i doubt it, honestly.

    • Sundial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Best they can do is thoughts and prayers. Oh wait, that was school shootings. Never mind then.

    • KITA@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Okay, now let us know how you plan to keep Hamas and Hezbollah from continuing to attack Israel. Or does it not count when Jews are being genocided?

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 minutes ago

        The current extremist government in Israel knows exactly what they need to do to stop Hamas and Hezbollah from continuing to attack Israel, they just don’t want to. They’d rather continue to create the conditions for extremism so that these attacks can be used as justification to finish their genocide.

        At this point we know that if you keep an entire group of people poor and oppressed with no prospect of economic opportunity or achieving a viable state, they become easier to recruit into a terrorist group. What have they got left to lose? Why NOT grab a rocket and attack your oppressors? This is why international law doesn’t allow the creation of stateless persons…

        Israel could STOP settlement expansion into the West Bank, first and foremost. They could start complying with international law and internationally recognized borders. They could stop working AGAINST a two state solution.

        Maybe the Israelis could stop assassinating their own leaders when they work towards peaceful solutions. They could also stop radicalizing their own youth and defense forces to believe that the only solution is to exterminate the Palestinians.

        There is a whole range of things that they could do… I wonder why they don’t?

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        You aren’t allowed to criticize Hamas and Hezbollah on here. Only IDF. Or actually all of Israel. Unless you are some Iranian-backing anti-Zionist, you get downvoted. It’s too bad what has happened to discourse on Lemmy that people aren’t even willing to contemplate the actions of all parties involved.

      • machinin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        After burning those kids alive, honestly, I’ve given up caring what happens to the people in Israel.