• bluejay@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    People are quick to forget the second amendment exists for situations like this.

    “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”

    “being necessary to the security of a free State” being the key point here. I find it ironic that every time anyone tries to pass any gun legislation the right cry foul saying they need to defend themselves from a tyrannical government. Then literally elect an outspoken tyrant. Neo-liberals (diet conservatives basically) are so busy jerking themselves off about how great they are, forgot why the second amendment exists. Despite all the cries for help, scared of fascism, they did nothing to actually prepare for the perceived threat. If it came down to it, toe to toe, left vs right, they’d get slaughtered. They’re afraid of guns.

    Now am I saying we need a violent coup d’etat? Nah. But some people are wholly convinced Trump is going to go full on fascist. Do things like invoke the insurrection act, declare martial law and suspend habeas corpus. To those people, y’all need to rethink your stance on arms. If it’s coming and you want to stop that freight train? That’s war. And you’re not ready.

    • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      My guy…

      They can drop bombs on you from hundreds of miles away via an unmanned drone…

      Would you people please remember the day and age we are in now? Holy shit.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Waco & Ruby Ridge.

      People don’t forget. They just get their asses handed to them when they try.

      How the hell is Jim Bob going to fight the federal government with his AR-15 when the government can drop a missile on him from a remote control drone?

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You think civilians with guns are going to thwart an army?

      Sure, if they are coming after you directly and you’ve got nothing else to lose, it would make sense to make a stand.

      But if you preemptively show that you are a threat then you will be bringing that upon yourself, and possibly others, needlessly. We have seen this before, as another user pointed out, with Waco and Ruby Ridge.

      Do not make yourself a target and a danger when the threat against you is just shitty laws that benefit the wealthy.

      • zarp86@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Do not make yourself a target and a danger when the threat against you is just shitty laws that benefit the wealthy.

        Bold of you to assume that’s the only threat.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      The 2nd amendment is not and was never meant to be a permission slip to use against the sitting US government, tyrannical or otherwise. This is a rhetoric, a myth, a deliberate misinterpretation that has spread far, but holds no basis is reality. It is absurd on the face of it.

      The idea you are proporting is that there is a legal window for insurrection in the constitution so long as it is used in defense of a “free state” against a supposedly tyrannical administration. If such a legal window exists, it would mean that A) there are such times that violent overthrow of the government is sanctioned by said government, B) that any old member of a violent coup gets to determine that their actions are legal by their intent to secure a free state, and C) that if any semblance of the original government survives the coup attempt, that their hands are bound by the constitution and the attempted violent overthrowers can face no legal consequences. What’s more, this supposed right will be upheld by the government that is, again, so tyrranical as to make it legal to destroy it at gunpoint. This is just patently foolish to believe.

      Make no mistake. If you or anyone else attempts to or does use violent force against ANY form of the US government, you will be violently resisted, arrested or killed by that government. You will not be given any protection from the 2nd amendment for this, ESPECIALLY under a tyrranical administration. If you choose to take such action, just know that you do so under no protection under the law and you will either win, die trying, or spend the remainder of your life in prison. Those are the only outcomes. You will be inciting a civil war. Also if you do win, good luck creating a new stable government in a politically divided nation after a violent overthrow.

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thank you. There was no real professional army when the 2nd Amendment and the Bill of Rights was drafted. The Continental Army was disbanded and the militias were where most of our fighting forces came from in the War for Independence. “You will find a gun behind every blade of grass”. That is why the 2nd Amendment was drafted. “Well regulated” ment trained and prepared to fight.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly, Democrats should just en masse go full pro-gun, and push the “to protect ourselves from tyranny” narrative and fucking dare Republicans to disagree.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Democrats can’t do anything right. The party is beyond saving. The progressive element needs to splinter off and start actually working for the people

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      People are quick to forget the second amendment exists for situations like this.

      and that’s why we have the highest prison population per capita on the planet: criminal charges are the last good way to deny someone access to firearms

      • bluejay@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Definitely part of it for sure. Part of a larger machine to weaken and stupefy the population.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Disagreed, the Democratic party suffering a temporary implosion does mean most Americans are on board with what the Republican party is proposing. Exit polls showed a lot of voters were basically at “I don’t believe the Democratic party when they say Trump is a threat to democracy and human rights because I think the system will protect us from that, but I do believe I’m spending more on groceries than I was four years ago and I think Republicans will fix that because they’re good at business stuff,” which I think we both know is a very wrong take on what’s about to happen, but that’s a population we can work with to resist fascism.

      The average American isn’t ragingly hateful, they’re just profoundly uninterested in anything happening outside their own life (probably because they work 60+ hours a week and are still one car crash or medical event away from being destitute) and really need the “marginalized people will suffer and die” constantly shoved in their face for them to recognize that. That is not good, but I believe it is a solvable problem.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        and really need the “marginalized people will suffer and die” constantly shoved in their face for them to recognize that.

        Shit dude, this lecturing garbage just failed. You need to get the base out, and lecturing them just makes it clear that you regard them with contempt.

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Very well stated. Thank you. There were 16 million people that voted in '20 that sat out and wouldn’t vote for either candidate. He got his base to the polls, but that’s it, and did not grow his support at all. Dems lost 10 million votes that came out for Biden (what the hell did the DNC do with the $1 Billion??!?!). That’s not a real mandate.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No matter what the Roberts Supreme Court says, the president is not a king, and he is not entitled to ignore the law in order to do whatever he pleases.

    “Hold my beer.”

    Trump and his ilk have one very strong play that they have used over and over and over again: Break the law and dare the justice system to do anything about it. Delay everything. Do whatever you want and avoid consequences.

    Trump has stacked SCOTUS and the federal courts. Any outcome he doesn’t like will just get appealed to someone whose mandate is “figure out how to shield Trump from consequences.” If that’s not a king, I don’t know what is.