• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think for many is shock and surprise is that anything even remotely “ml” is even allowed. Like something illegal is being allowed in plain sight.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Who makes that distinction? Plus, the idea of destroying the state, Capitalism, class divides, and money definitely is legally opposed.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                … literally anyone who thinks about it? The US Communist Party is one party, there are plenty of other parties that identify as communist. You don’t have to be called “The Communist Party” to be communist.

                Socialist Alternative

                Revolutionary Communist Party

                Workers World Party

                New Afrikan Black Panther Party

                Party for Socialism and Liberation

                Communist parties aren’t popular at all, but they’re far from banned. There are multiple such parties.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Laws are interpreted and wielded by those in power. The Democrats are already called Communists, what happens if a genuine Socialist party takes some amount of power?

                  • force@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    That’s literally an argument against anything that exists at all. That’s kind of how laws work, linguistics is complicated so everyone’s interpretation is different, and many people in power intentionally misinterperet laws. But as it stands, communist parties are not banned. What you speak of is a big “what if”, and currently you saying communism as a whole is banned is simply wrong, even as an oversimplification.

                    It is a big stretch to turn “Parties other than the two largest ones in the country have considerable cultural, legal, and logistical obstacles to being able to participate in high-level American politics, and an unenforced law from 70 years ago banned one specific communist party before most of the provisions being repealed by congress and the law being overturned in state courts as unconstitutional” into “Communism is banned in the United States”. There is no legal way to criminally prosecute someone on the basis of them being a communist, or belonging to any specific communist party at all, in the modern day.

                    I’m not trying to be condescending or anything btw.

          • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Someone better tell these people they all could be arrested at any moment!

            https://www.cpusa.org/

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA

            No but seriously it’s an unenforceable junk law that no one has bothered to take the time to repeal that was never even really used in the first place. I mean, the communist party runs candidates for office to this day. Someone finally tried to use it in 1972 to keep a communist candidate off the ballot and a federal district Court promptly ruled it unconstitutional.

            https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/1zey0ee5l/arizona-district-court/blawis-v-bolin/

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.

              • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’d say more broadly the legal and political system works against any organizations that threaten the status quo, but yes America’s attitudes toward communism have been pretty obvious throughout the twentieth century. I just took issue with the idea that political parties or idealogies are illegal in and of themselves in the US, constitution still manages to protects some things.

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If you had actually read the Wikipedia article:

            In 1973, a federal district court in Arizona decided that the act was unconstitutional, and Arizona could not keep the party off the ballot in the 1972 general election (Blawis v. Bolin). In 1961, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the act did not bar the party from participating in New York’s unemployment insurance system (Communist Party v. Catherwood).

            So yes, the law passed during the the McCarthy era … and was afterwards declared unconstitutional.

            The Communist Party USA is still around and even have a website.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.