• Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Some really scientifically based response by ChatGPT

            Sending 1MB of data to Mars depends on the distance between Earth and Mars and the data transfer rate, which varies widely. When Earth and Mars are closest, about 54.6 million kilometers apart, using NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) as a reference, with rates up to 250 kbps under optimal conditions, it would take approximately 32 seconds to send 1MB. However, this is an ideal scenario, and actual times could be longer due to various factors like signal processing and interplanetary communication delays.

            • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s not latency though.

              The average ping, or round-trip communication delay, between Earth and Mars varies depending on their relative positions in their orbits. On average, it ranges from about 4 to 24 minutes, due to the vast distance between the two planets. This latency presents significant challenges for real-time communication and coordination between Earth and Mars missions.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d be willing to bet this isn’t real.

    I’ve been to lots of scientific talks and the idea of someone trying to call put the person talking is kind of ridulous and never happens. You would have to an asshole of the highest calibre to do that. And the fact he mentions a specific paper/person and that just happened to be tbe person speaking and the idea that the speakers name wasn’t listed is just so incredibly unlikely I can’t ever imagine that happening.

    This just seems like the kind of thing people fantasing happening, so they can smugly correct them.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I find it unnecessary. Race/gender/skin color or whatever shouldn’t matter.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You know how it goes, not all white males… but almost always it is a white male.

          This guy probably wouldn’t have even considered insulting a speaker that way if she wasn’t a woman. In a scientific setting it’s one thing disagreeing with an argument, and attacking the person proposing the argument.

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Yes, but until recently they weren’t even accepted into colleges, were they? Almost like oppression is intersectional or something.

              EDIT: refer to my response to Mango. Y’all way stupider/bigoted than I gave you credit for in the first place.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yet somehow it is true that the vast majority of smug people who are confidently wrong are white males. Maybe someday we can have equality in the ratio of being smug while confidently wrong.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        When someone commits a robbery and they happen to be the race that commits robberies the most often, do you feel the need to point that out?

      • Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Yes and I don’t think you pointing out the truth of this stereotype is unwarranted here. But her pointing it out in the first place was. Replace this with another accurate stereotype about another race. Let’s say there’s a city in which a certain race, per capita, commits crimes more than another. Does that warrant someone saying, “So I got mugged, and of course it was a black guy!”

        This type of stereotyping is clearly spiteful, ignores greater understanding about the social situation, and perpetuates the untrue idea most people conflate with these stereotypes: Every member of the race is like this. This is even internalized by members of the race in question, perpetuating the greater social issue itself.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        By pointing out the gender (and race) of the other person even though it’s completely irrelevant.

        • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If the original sexist behaviour was typically done by women to other women just as often as by men, the gender of the perpetrator wouldn’t matter,.

          Fact of the matter is that this kind of shutting women up and taking down to them is overwhelmingly done by men.

          That’s true in the business world, academic world, etc.

          Considering this, this is a key piece of information about the situation, not a sexist way to blame men.

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            To paraphrase my comment from elsewhere in this thread:

            When someone commits a robbery and they happen to be the race that commits robberies the most often, do you think their race is a key piece of information that should be included when talking about the robbery?